JUAN CARLOS FAXAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUAN CARLOS FAXAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
975 So. 2d 1269
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s right to exhaust administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections, and thereafter, if unsatisfied with the results, to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the proper venue. See, e.g. Dandashi v. State, 956 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)(affirming trial court order denying motion for credit without prejudice to ap pellant to first exhaust his administrative remedies with DOC, and then file for mandamus in the trial court if necessary); King v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Davis v. State, 943 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
FARMER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cooper v. State, 993 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…CURIAM. Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s right to exhaust all administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections as to its record on his addiction recovery supervision, and if appropriate, to seek mandamus relief. Faxas v. State, 975 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). STONE, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Jennings v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Jawan King v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Davis v. State, 943 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Mohamed Dandashi v. State, 956 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)