JAMES PRINCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES PRINCE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
976 So. 2d 43
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We further admonish appellant that, because of his total mischarac-terization of the sentencing transcript, any further actions of this nature may result in sanctions being imposed by the Department of Corrections. See Rivera v. State, 943 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. STONE, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.