JAMES PACHECO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES PACHECO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
979 So. 2d 407
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla.2005), and Alvarez v. State, 358 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1978).
SAWAYA, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Debary Real Est. Holdings, LLC v. State, 112 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…. This interpretation is also supported by the rule of statutory [*167] construction that the use of different terms in different statutes on the same subject indicates that the Legislature intended distinct meanings. Guckenberger v. Seminole Cnty., 979 So. 2d 407, 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). In other statutes setting forth different classification schemes for pari-mu-tuel permits, the Legislature used the present-tense phrase “there are” to guide the Division’s inquiry concerning the relationship between a coun…
-
O'Connor v. Indian River Cnty. Fire Rescue/Johns E. Co., Inc., 197 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…to appeal or which subsumed any interlocutory orders leading up to it. And it was this dismissal that entitled Appellees to prevailing-party costs, and the proceedings leading to the costs judgment were ancillary. See Guckenberger v. Seminole Cty., 979 So. 2d 407, 408-09 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“ ‘Costs are statutory allowances recoverable by the successful party as an incident to the main adjudication. They are neither part of the damages claimed nor a penalty and need not be specially pleaded or claimed.’ ” (…
-
Medina v. Miami Dade Cnty. & Risk Mgmt. of Dade Cnty., 300 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)…e such a directive. Under these facts, we agree. “The Judges of Compensation Claims are ‘vested only with certain limited quasi-judicial powers relating to the adjudication of claims for compensation and benefits.’” Guckenberger v. Seminole County, 979 So. 2d 407, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (quoting Smith v. Piezo Tech. & Prof’l Adm’rs, 427 So. 2d 182, 184 (Fla. 1983)). This Court has previously determined that a JCC has jurisdiction to order reinstatement of sick and vacation leave 5 Following the merits hear…
Authorities Cited
- Alphonso Alvarez v. State, 358 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1978)
- Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005)