J.R.P., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
J.R.P., a juvenile, was convicted of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon under Florida law. The appellate court reversed, holding that the four-inch folding knife J.R.P. carried fell within the statutory exception for common pocketknives and therefore could not constitute a weapon under the statute.
The court held that J.R.P.'s knife falls within the common pocketknife statutory exception because it was a knife with a four-inch blade that folds into the handle and can be carried in one's pocket. As a matter of law, J.R.P. could not be found guilty of carrying a concealed weapon since the knife did not constitute a weapon under the statute.
[1] A knife with a blade of four inches or less that folds into the handle and can be carried in one's pocket falls within the common pocketknife exception to the definition…
[2] A pocketknife found in the open position or possessing distinctive weapon-like characteristics, such as a hilt guard or notched combat-style grip, does not qualify for th…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a common pocketknife was a 'type of knife occurring frequently in the community which has a blade that folds into the handle and that can be carried in one's pocket.'”
Establishes the legal definition of a common pocketknife exception under Florida law, requiring a folding blade and portability.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA Miami-Dade police officer stopped and searched J.R.P. based on a confidential informant's tip that he was carrying a knife. J.R.P. admitted to carry…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Common Pocketknife Exception cases and more on FLexlaw
RAMIREZ, J.
J.R.P. seeks reversal of the trial court’s order finding him guilty of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, in violation of section 790.01(1), Florida Statutes (2006). Because the knife J.R.P. was carrying falls within the common pocketknife exception to the definition of a weapon, we reverse.
Pursuant to a confidential informant’s tip that J.R.P. was carrying a knife, a Miami-Dade police officer stopped and searched J.R.P. When asked by the officer, J.R.P. admitted to carrying a knife in his back pocket. The officer confiscated the knife. In his report of the incident, the officer described the knife as a “hunting knife with a four inch blade.” Another officer who impounded the knife described it as a “pocketknife.”
The defense filed two motions for dismissal on the basis that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that the knife was a weapon. The trial court denied both these motions stating that based on the totality of circumstances the knife was not a pocketknife and that the State had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial court withheld adjudication and imposed probation.
J.R.P. appeals that order stating that the knife falls within the common pocketknife exception to the concealed weapons statute. We agree with J.R.P. and reverse. Under section 790.001(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), a concealed weapon means “any dirk, metallic knuckles, slung-shot, billie, tear gas gun, chemical weapon or device, or other deadly weapon carried on or about a person in such a manner as to conceal the weapon from the ordinary sight of another person.” Section 790.001(13), Florida Statutes (2006), further defines a weapon as any “dirk, knife, metallic knuckles, slungshot, billie, tear gas gun, chemical weapon or device, or other deadly weapon except a firearm or a common pocketknife, plastic knife, or blunt-bladed table knife.”
In L.B. v. State, 700 So. 2d 370, 372 (Fla.1997), the Florida Supreme Court held that a common pocketknife was a “type of knife occurring frequently in the community which has a blade that folds into the handle and that can be carried in one’s pocket.” Id. The Florida Supreme Court also relied on an opinion from the Attorney General stating that a knife with a blade of four inches or less is a common pocketknife. Id. at 373.
A pocketknife which is found in the open position or which has a distinctive weapon-like characteristic such as a hilt guard or notched combat-style grip, does not fall within the common pocketknife exception. See Porter v. State, 798 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); J.D.L.R. v. State, 701 So. 2d 626, 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The knife here was neither open nor did it contain any weapon-like characteristics. J.R.P. simply possessed a knife that can be carried in one’s pocket, with a four-inch blade that folds into the handle. Therefore, as a matter of law, J.R.P.’s knife falls within the common pocketknife statutory exception to the definition of a weapon, and J.R.P. could not be found guilty of carrying a concealed weapon.
Accordingly, we reverse the order finding J.R.P. guilty of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
K.H. v. State, 29 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…hird District said: “A pocketknife which is found in the open position or which has a distinctive weapon-like characteristic such as a hilt guard or notched combat-style grip, does not fall within the common pocketknife exception.” (J.R.P. v. State, 979 So. 2d 1178, 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Porter v. State, 798 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)); J.D.L.R, 701 So. 2d at 627). Here, the trial testimony indicates that the knife at issue is a folding-type switchblade with a double-edged blade approximate…
-
T.S.W. v. State, 82 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…characteristics of a common poeketknife and has no weapon-like characteristics such as a hilt guard, notched combat-style grip, double-edged blade, or switchblade; furthermore, it was not carried in an open and locked position. See J.R.P. v. State, 979 So. 2d 1178, 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Porter v. State, 798 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)); J.D.L.R. v. State, 701 So. 2d at 627; see also K.H. v. State, 29 So. 3d 426, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying the motio…
-
F.R. v. State, 81 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…State, 882 So. 2d 890, 891 (Fla.2004). This Court has found that a knife “which has a distinctive weapon-like characteristic such as a hilt guard or notched combat-style grip, does not fall within the common pocketknife exception.” J.R.P. v. State, 979 So. 2d 1178, 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).2 We [*574] have also found a knife with these characteristics to be distinctly unlike the knife which qualified for the exception in L.B.: The judge described J.D.L.R.’s knife as a folding knife with a pointed 3½ inch blad…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- L.B. v. State, 700 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1997)
- Marceline Porter v. State, 798 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- J.D.L.R. v. State, 701 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)