STUART WATTS, APPELLANT,

v.

ACADEMY FOR FIVE ELEMENT ACUPUNCTURE, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Charneco v. Gayda, 72 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …essential requirements of law, I see no reason why the harm that will result from the order cannot be corrected on plenary appeal. The order fails to meet the requirements for certiorari review of an order denying discovery. See Romanos v. Caldwell, 980 So. 2d 1091, 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). (observing that certiorari review of orders denying discovery “is reserved for extraordinary and highly unusual situations where the trial court’s order constitutes a serious departure from the essential requirements of la…
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Nicolette Strachan, 82 So. 3d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …ement amounts are no longer relevant. [*1054] The denial of discovery is generally not renewable by certiorari. Power Plant Entm’t, LLC v. Tramp Hotels & Casino Resorts Dev. Co., 958 So. 2d 565, 567 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Romanos v. Caldwell, 980 So. 2d 1091, 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). In this petition, however, Wal-Mart asserts that certiorari is the appropriate remedy because it will suffer material irreparable harm without any alternative evidence to prove its entitlement to a set-off at trial. Wal-Ma…
• Preudhomme v. Garth Bailey, 186 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …upon Former Wife’s Motion to Compel Accurate, Complete. Responses to Her Supple-. [*1084] mental Request to Produce. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the order. See Goslin v. Preisser, 148 So. 3d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Romanos v. Caldwell, 980 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Affirmed in part and dismissed in part. WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur. . Effective January 1, 2015, rule 9.020(i)(3) was amended to provide that "the appeal shall be held in abeyance until the filing of a signed, writ…

Authorities Cited

• Ostman v. Lawn, 305 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)