FRED FLEMING, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
FRED FLEMING, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
980 So. 2d 1102
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Denis v. State, 137 So. 3d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…she contests the factual assertions on which the strike is based. See Hoskins v. State, 965 So. 2d 1, 9 (Fla.2007) (stating that the defendant’s failure to question the facts on which the strike was based waived the issue for review); Doe v. State, 980 So. 2d 1102, 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (affirming the trial court’s decision to sustain the peremptory strike because “defense counsel did not challenge the facts on which the strikes were based and thus failed to preserve this issue for appellate review”). In…
-
Geovani Johnson v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Brown v. State, 994 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…eserve this issue for appeal, defense counsel must “place the court on notice that he or she contests the factual existence of the reason.” Floyd v. State, 569 So. 2d 1225, 1229 (Fla.1990); Hoskins v. State, 965 So. 2d 1, 9 (Fla.2007); Doe v. State, 980 So. 2d 1102, 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). In the present case, defense counsel was required to point out that there were other jurors who had been just as quiet as Ramkhelawan, if not more so, but who had not been challenged, and thus, that the state’s proffered r…