RANDALL WHITNEY, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Gosciminski v. State, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)
  …itted into evidence. See, e.g., Gordon v. State, 863 So. 2d 1215, 1219 (Fla.2003) (stating that testimony about cell phone records and comparing them to locations on cell site maps was not expert testimony and was properly admitted); Perez v. State, 980 So. 2d 1126, 1131-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (ruling that cell phone records, cell site maps, and testimony explaining them was properly admitted and did not constitute expert testimony); Pullin v. State, 272 Ga. 747, 534 S.E. 2d 69, 71 (2000) (ruling that expert te…
• State v. Garrett Scott Crofoot, 97 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …Fire Ins. Co. v. Wells, 438 So. 2d 46, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The presumption of reliability— and, thus, the hearsay exception — applies only to self-inculpatory statements, not to neutral or self-exculpatory statements. [*869] See Perez v. State, 980 So. 2d 1126, 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Such statements are not exempt from the general rule excluding hearsay simply because they appear in the same document as comments that are ti’uly against the declarant’s interest. See id.; Brooks v. State, 787 So. 2d 765,…
• McMillian v. State, 214 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 2017)
  …stify about phone records. See Gordon v. State, 863 So. 2d 1215, 1219 (Fla. 2003) (stating that testimony about cell phone records and comparing them to locations on cell site maps was not expert testimony and was properly admitted); Perez v. State, 980 So. 2d 1126, 1131-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (ruling that cell phone records, cell site maps, and testimony explaining them was properly admitted and did not constitute expert testimony). Here, Wolcott testified about the contents of the cell phone records and spok…