MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, PETITIONER,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
981 So. 2d 674
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Clarification
PER CURIAM.
We grant the State of Florida’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our order issued May 16, 2008, and substitute the following in its stead.
Petitioner, Michael Hernandez, seeks a writ of prohibition based on the trial judge’s summary refusal to disqualify himself. Because we find that the trial judge’s complained of comments did not rise to the level necessary for disqualification, we deny the petition with prejudice.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.H. v. State, 71 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…e terms, even if the originally pronounced sentence was illegal for failing to include minimum mandatory term; further holding that it was a violation of double jeopardy protections to increase the sentence after jeopardy attached); T.D.D. v. State, 981 So. 2d 674, 675-76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (agreeing with the state’s concession that second disposition order had to be reversed and new disposition order reflecting court’s earlier oral pronouncement had to be entered); Obara v. State, 958 So. 2d 1019, 1021-22 (F…