VLADIMIR JEANTY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• M.M. v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 189 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2016)
  …sis supplied) (citations omitted); In re A.W.P., Jr., 10 So. 3d 134, 135-36 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (treating an appeal from an order entered after dependency adjudication as petition for writ of certiorari). But see B.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 981 So. 2d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (treating termination of departmental supervision order as a final, appealable order); R.M., 19 So. 3d at 1031 (Fifth District reviewing a post-disposition dependency order as appealable pursuant tó rule 9.130(a)(4)). Seco…
• L.T. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 48 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …nd service of process requirements set forth in sections 39.502 and 39.503 of the Florida [*931] Statutes (2009). However, DCF waived this issue for purposes of appellate review by failing to raise it below. See B.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 981 So. 2d 1229, 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Lastly, DCF contends that the trial court’s order dismissing the dependency petition is moot because K.S.L. has reached the age of majority. In F.L.M., the Fourth District held that the appeal of the trial court’s order d…
• F.E. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families & the Guardian Ad Litem Program, 1 So. 3d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …s not appealable, we treat the proceeding as one which seeks certio-rari review, but deny relief. In contrast to A.L. v. Department of Children and Family Services, 805 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), and B.M. v. Department of Children and Families, 981 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), we find no abuse of discretion in the refusal to grant the mother any present visitation based on extensive expert and lay testimony that, because of severe physical abuse, the child is in fear of the mother and would suffer ser…

Authorities Cited

• Lasundra A. Harley v. State, 924 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)