CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS UEBERSCHAER, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
UPON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court’s mandate in Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Ueberschaer, 979 So. 2d 929 (Fla.2008), which quashed and remanded our opinion in Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Ueberschaer, 956 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), we have reconsidered the merits of this case under the principles announced in Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. Cox, 967 So. 2d 815 (Fla.2007). Accordingly, the final summary judgment issued in favor of Appellee, Thomas Ueberschaer, is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Cox. This reversal necessarily requires us to vacate our previous order partially granting Appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees. Appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees is hereby denied.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Travelers Commercial Ins. Co. v. Harrington, 187 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…1: This court’s order dated May 10, 2012, granting Appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees is vacated, and Appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees, filed October 17, 2011, is denied. See Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Ueberschaer, 981 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). 2. The request to set aside the judgments resulting from this court’s prior order granting Appellee’s motion for ap [*883] pellate attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice to Appellant seeking such relief in the trial court.…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. COX, 967 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2007)
- Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Ueberschaer, 956 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Ueberschaer, 979 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 2008)