VINCENT ROEBUCK, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2008-05-15
No. SC07-807
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
982 So. 2d 683 Florida Supreme Court (2008) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Roebuck v. State, 953 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), a decision in which the First District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decisions in Jaggers v. State, 536 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and Cliburn v. State, 710 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we have now determined that Roebuck is not in conflict with Jaggers and Cliburn and that jurisdiction should be discharged. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pantoja v. State, 990 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
    …extent they create a false reporting exception to section 90.610, Florida Statutes.” The supreme court initially accepted jurisdiction and, after a determination that there was no express conflict, dismissed the review proceedings. Roebuck v. State, 982 So. 2d 683, 683 (Fla. 2008). While the supreme court did not explain its determination of no conflict, we recognize several potential reasons for the determination: (1) that the Roebuck Court expressly distinguished Jaggers and Clibum, (2) that the Roebuck Cou…
  • Washington v. State, 985 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …e Court of Florida initially accepted jurisdiction in Roebuck v. State, 959 So. 2d 717 (Fla.2007), but subsequently dismissed the appeal, concluding that Roebuck is not in conflict with Jaggers and Cliburn and that jurisdiction should be discharged. 982 So. 2d 683 (Fla.2008).…
  • Kovaleski v. State, 1 So. 3d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …eached by evidence that, on an unrelated occasion, the victim had filed a false police report that his car, which- he had actually lent to a friend, had been stolen. We relied on Roebuck v. State, 953 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), review dismissed, 982 So. 2d 683 (Fla.2008), which held that, under our evidence code, the credibility of a witness may not be attacked by proof of a specific act of misconduct which did not end in a [*257] criminal conviction. Shortly prior to Washington, in Fehringer v. State, 97…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw