EDDIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDDIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
982 So. 2d 1234
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Rangel v. State, 937 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morris Publ'g Grp., LLC v. State of Fla. & Michael D. Dunn, 136 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…rs is one of the essential stages of a criminal trial where the defendant’s presence is required.” Salcedo v. State, 497 So. 2d 1294, 1295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (citing Lane v. State, 459 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)); see also Luyao v. State, 982 So. 2d 1234, 1235 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (noting that the “ ‘examination and challenge of potential jurors is one of the essential stages of a criminal trial where a defendant’s presence is mandated’ ”) (emphasis added) (quoting Matthews v. State, 687 So. 2d 908,…
-
Jerry v. State, 15 So. 3d 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…hment. A similar challenge to the procedures used to qualify a defendant for PRR sentencing based on Yisrael was rejected as improper under rule 3.800(a) by this Court in Ives v. State, 993 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). See also Williams v. State, 982 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Affirmed. WARNER, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Rangel v. State, 937 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)