MIAMI AUTOMOTIVE RETAIL, INC. D/B/A BRICKELL MOTORS, APPELLANT,
v.
SILVANA DE LEOZ AND LAUTARO LEOZ, APPELLEES
MIAMI AUTOMOTIVE RETAIL, INC. D/B/A BRICKELL MOTORS, APPELLANT,
SILVANA DE LEOZ AND LAUTARO LEOZ, APPELLEES
983 So. 2d 1242
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So. 2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (“It is the responsibility and duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned .... ”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jossy Mansur and Serge Mansur v. Podhurst Orseck, P.A., 994 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…sional negligence. But on the narrow question considered below, whether or not the appellants have created a genuine issue regarding a material fact, we are required to reverse as to these two appellants. Moore, 475 So. 2d at 668; Berkow v. Isaevna, 983 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Model Rules of Profl Conduct Scope ¶ 17 (2004) (‘Whether a client-lawyer relationship exists for any specific purpose can depend on the circumstances and may be a question of fact.”). Reversed and remanded for further proceeding…
Authorities Cited
- Carpenter v. State, 176 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)