TROY L. BLOCKER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
TROY L. BLOCKER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
985 So. 2d 1089
Florida Supreme Court (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), review granted, 973 So. 2d 1119 (Fla.2007) (table), a decision in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified questions to be of great public importance. See 968 So. 2d at 688-89, 694; art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., did not participate.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brantley v. State, 32 So. 3d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…on the accuracy of the transcript of the sentencing hearing, thus creating a disputed issue of fact. As such, Mr. Brantley’s claim is not remediable under rule 3.800(a). See Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686, 688 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), review dismissed, 985 So. 2d 1089 (2008). Because the time for Brantley to seek relief under rule 3.850 had not yet run and his motion contained the oath required by that rule, we remand for the postconviction court to consider his motion pursuant to rule 3.850. Affirmed, but rema…
Authorities Cited
- Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)