STEFAN M. LINDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEFAN M. LINDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
985 So. 2d 1144
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
See Metellus v. State, 817 So. 2d 1009, 1014 n. 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (defendant will not be relieved of obligation that was included as specific component of plea agreement that was bargained for and voluntarily entered into by defendant); see also Garcia v. State, 722 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Henderson v. State, 88 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…and that his “continued flight in knowing defiance of the officer’s lawful order to stop” constituted resisting an officer without violence. C.E.L., 24 So. 3d at 1189. Accord Williams v. State, 55 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Livingston v. State, 985 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). In the case at bar, had appellant pulled over immediately after Dep. Floyd activated his lights and siren, there would have been insufficient evidence in the record to justify the stop. When appellant continued driving, however…
Authorities Cited
- Garcia v. State, 722 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Wilfrid Metellus v. State, 817 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)