J.S., MOTHER OF L.A., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL., APPELLEES
J.S., MOTHER OF L.A., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL., APPELLEES
986 So. 2d 662
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The mother appeals an order terminating her parental rights. The Department of Children and Families, appellee in this cause, has filed a notice of intent not to file answer brief and request for remand to the trial court for entry of findings. This filing reflects the department’s agreement with appellant that the order does not comply with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.260(a), which requires that all orders of the court be reduced to writing and contain specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. We treat the department’s notice as a concession of error, find it to be proper, and reverse and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.S. v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 18 So. 3d 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ng these rulings. We previously reversed and remanded both orders for lack of sufficient factual findings. Guardian ad Litem Program v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 986 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); J.S. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 986 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). On remand, the trial court entered amended orders with the same dispositions as the previous orders, but with expanded factual findings. In the amended order terminating the mother’s rights, the trial court found that the Depar…
-
Mancino v. State, 10 So. 3d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…the order of the trial court that denied, with prejudice, Joseph Sal Mancino’s motion for postconviction relief. Through a previous appeal, the case was remanded for consideration of the substance of the forty-two page motion. See Mancino v. State, 986 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). We had been directed to Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007), but found its application premature. In Spera, the Florida Supreme Court determined that a trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to provide a post…