JEROME DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEROME DAVIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
987 So. 2d 229
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion on Ground II so that the denial is without prejudice to amend. Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla.2007).
KLEIN, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010)…Parole Commission, 958 So. 2d 564, 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), the Second District explicitly adopted the reasoning of the First District in Martin and also certified that its decision was in conflict with Cooper. In Smith v. Florida Parole Commission, 987 So. 2d 229, 229-30 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), the Fourth District affirmed its ear [*707] lier decision in Cooper and also certified that its decision was in conflict with Martin and Carpenter. The opinion in the case before this Court today in its entirety provide…1 / 2
-
Jones v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 4 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…f. We summarily affirm, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), concluding that the circuit court did not err in dismissing the habeas corpus petition as untimely. See § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2008); Smith v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 987 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Cooper, 924 So. 2d at 967. As we did in Smith, we certify conflict with Martin v. Florida Parole Commission, 951 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), rev. dismissed, 957 So. 2d 635 (Fla.2007), and Carpenter v. Florida Parole Commissi…
Authorities Cited
- Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007)