HAROLD BENJAMIN AND DONNA BENJAMIN, APPELLANTS,
v.
CR HANCOCK BRIDGE, LLC, BAYSHORE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in transferring venue based on witness inconvenience.
The Benjamins sued Hancock in Broward County. Hancock moved to transfer venue to Lee County, asserting inconvenience for nine witnesses located there.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Transfer Of Venue cases and more on FLexlaw
DAMOORGIAN, J.
Harold and Donna Benjamin (“Benja-mins”) appeal from an order granting CR Hancock Bridge, LLC’s (“Hancock”) motion to transfer venue from Broward County, Florida to Lee County, Florida. We affirm, writing to address only the issue of forum non conveniens.
After the Benjamins brought an action against Hancock in Broward County, Hancock moved to transfer venue to Lee County on the basis that it was inconvenient for their witnesses. Included with the motion to transfer venue was an affidavit listing nine (9) witnesses Hancock would call to testify, the relevant information that they would testify to, and the assertion that all witnesses were located in and around Lee County. There is no dispute that Lee County would be a proper venue.
Venue may be transferred “[f]or the convenience of the parties or witnesses or in the interest of justice.” § 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2007). Of the three reasons for transferring venue, the convenience of the witnesses has been deemed the most important consideration. Wynn Drywall, Inc. v. Aequicap Program Adm’r’s, Inc., 953 So. 2d 28, 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Hancock’s affidavit asserting witness inconvenience and the general, material information to which the witnesses would testify was sufficient to permit transfer of venue to Lee County. See Eggers v. Eggers, 776 So. 2d 1096, 1098 n. 2 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (showing the “gist” of relevant knowledge of witnesses is sufficient to support a motion to transfer venue). Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in transferring venue to Lee County for forum non conveniens.
Affirmed.
KLEIN, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Frederick W.J. Eggers v. Eggers, 776 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Wynn Drywall, Inc. v. Aequicap Program Administrators, Inc., 953 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)