JOHN W. TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
John Tillman, a railroad worker, appeals a summary judgment dismissing his FELA negligence claim against Florida East Coast Railway for injuries caused by a defective switch. The court reversed, finding that genuine disputes of material fact existed regarding the railroad's knowledge of the switch's dangerous condition and its failure to maintain it properly.
The trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Material factual disputes existed that could support a jury inference that FEC knew about the age and deteriorating condition of the switches and their susceptibility to malfunction, yet continued operating them without adequate maintenance personnel.
[1] Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) actions tried in state courts are generally subject to the forum state's procedural rules.
[2] A trial court errs in granting summary judgment if the evidence would support an inference that the employer knew about the deteriorating condition of equipment and the n…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the evidence in the record would clearly support an inference by the jury that FEC knew about the age and deteriorating condition of its old low stand switches and knew that these switches were susceptible to becoming difficult to operate if not serviced on a weekly basis”
Establishes that sufficient evidence existed to create a jury question about FEC's knowledge of the switch defect
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTillman was injured while attempting to operate an old yard/new yard lead switch that was excessively hard to operate. The evidence showed that FEC kn…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Duty To Provide A Safe Place To Work cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this negligence action under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), John W. Tillman appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of Florida East Coast Railway, LCC (FEC), appellee. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. In his complaint, Tillman alleged that he “was injured as a result of [FEC’s] breach of duty when, as he attempted to operate the old yard/new yard lead switch, the switch suddenly and unexpectedly failed to function in a customary and reasonably safe manner in that it was excessively hard to operate causing [him] to sustain serious and permanent injury.” He further alleged that FEC was negligent in failing to exercise reasonable care to provide him with a reasonably safe place to work; in failing to maintain its track switches in a reasonably safe and operable condition; and in failing to inspect, discover, correct, repair and/or warn him of the defective condition of the switch which the railroad knew or should have known through the exercise of reasonable care, presented an unreasonable risk of harm to him in the performance of his duties.
Although there are numerous factual disputes apparent from the record, the evidence in the record would clearly support an inference by the jury that FEC knew about the age and deteriorating condition of its old low stand switches and knew that these switches were susceptible to becoming difficult to operate if not serviced on a weekly basis. The evidence would also support the inference that FEC continued to operate these old switches despite its knowledge that it did not have sufficient personnel with which to complete the necessary inspections and maintenance of these switches. Under the Florida summary judgment standards, Henderson v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 617 So. 2d 770, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“FELA actions tried in state courts are generally subject to the forum state’s procedural rules.”), the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. See also Green v. CSX Transp., Inc., 626 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (reversing where trial court relied upon federal decision which employed federal summary judgment standard).
REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Green v. CSX Transp., Inc., 626 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Henderson v. CSX Transp., Inc., 617 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)