SCOTT EARLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SCOTT EARLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
988 So. 2d 1130
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Williams v. State, 937 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
PALMER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marc E. Bosem, M.D. v. Musa Holdings, Inc., 46 So. 3d 42 (Fla. 2010)…. Moreover, “[t]o date, cases recognizing a right to prejudgment interest have all involved the loss of a vested property right,” and anticipated business profits are not a vested property right. See Scheible v. Joseph L. Morse Geriatric Ctr., Inc., 988 So. 2d 1130, 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Therefore, we reverse the award of prejudgment interest. As to all other issues, we affirm. Bosem, 8 So. 3d at 1186-87. ANALYSIS Because this is a pure question of law, our standard of review is de novo. So. Baptist Hos…
-
Marc E. Bosem, M.D. v. Musa Holdings, Inc., 8 So. 3d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…. Moreover, “[t]o date, cases recognizing a right to prejudgment interest have all involved the loss of a vested property right,” and anticipated business profits are not a vested property right. See Scheible v. Joseph L. Morse Geriatric Ctr., Inc., 988 So. 2d 1130, 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Therefore, we reverse the award of prejudgment interest. As to all other issues, we affirm. Reversed. HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 937 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)