JOSE RAFAEL DUENO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE RAFAEL DUENO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
988 So. 2d 1192
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. Although the written judgment reflects that appellant was convicted of a life felony, the offense is a first-degree felony. The trial court is directed to correct the judgment accordingly.
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. KAHN, LEWIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Howard v. Murray, 184 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…al fact, if it is conflicting, if it will permit different reasonable. inferences, or if it tends to prove the issues, it should be submitted to the jury as a question of fact to be determined by it.! ” Feizi v. Dep’t of Mgmt. Servs., State of Fla., 988 So. 2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (quoting Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985)). . Mr. Murray and Mr. Gardner acknowledged they were close friends; there was testimony that the'two speak on the phone two or three times each month, have lunch to…
-
Alpha Data Corp. v. HX5, L.L.C., 139 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…s no doubt that material fact issues remain. If there is even the slightest doubt that material factual issues remain, summary judgment may not be entered. Any doubts must be resolved in favor of the non-moving party. Feizi v. Dep’t of Mgmt. Servs., 988 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). As to allegations involving breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel and injunctive relief the record clearly shows that genuine issues of material fact remained as to whether Appel…
-
LIN v. Demings, 219 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…susceptible to a reasonable inference that the Sheriffs reasons for instituting the adverse employment action against him were, in fact, pre-textual.3 As such, it was error to enter summary judgment in this case. See Feizi v. Dep’t of Mgmt. Servs., 988 So. 2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, we reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED. BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur. . §…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)