MARSHALL LANDEVERDE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2008-05-14
No. 4D08-1054
POLEN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
989 So. 2d 654 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that denied Landeverde’s motion. We agree with the second district that Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla.2007) does not apply retroactively. See Davis v. State, — So. 2d-, 2008 WL 508654 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 27, 2008).

POLEN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Marcial Rodriquez v. State, 993 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
    …DCA 2008); [*154] Pierre v. State, 973 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). But see Davis v. State, 993 So. 2d 1045, 1046, 2008 WL 508654 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 27, 2008) (rejecting proposition that Spera should be applied retroactively); Landeverde v. State, 989 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same reasoning). The Spera issue was preserved only as to Ground Eight in Appellant’s initial brief. See Watson, 975 So. 2d at 573. In the final issue on appeal, Appellant asserts that the circuit court erred in summarily denyi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw