MONIQUE COPELAND, APPELLANT,

v.

PATRICK A. BARATTA, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND TREVISO BY THE SEA JOINT VENTURE LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET. AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Crew v. State, 146 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …s statement in closing argument that the “victim told the 911 operator that a bullet “wizzed’ past his head” was a mischaracterization of the evidence when no such statement was made, which the appellate court “will not condone”); Robinson v. State, 989 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing where the prosecutor stated in closing that a witness said “get the [defendant] out of here” because the prosecutor’s statement was a “false characterization of the testimony” and noting that although circumstantial evi…
• City OF Tampa v. Companioni, 26 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …ial court sustained its objections. Although a party whose objection is sustained must move for a mistrial in order to preserve the issue for appellate review, a motion for mistrial is not a prerequisite to moving for a new trial. Robinson v. State, 989 So. 2d 747, 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (stating that the absence of a motion for mistrial did not preclude the trial court from addressing an issue raised in a motion for a new trial); Nigro v. Brady, 781 So. 2d 54, 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“[T]he preservation rule…
• Sullivan v. Mark David Kanarek, M.D., & Nadal Pediatrics, P.A., 34 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …course of the trial in order to preserve the issue for purposes of a motion for new trial filed in the trial court. See City of Tampa v. Companioni, 26 So. 3d 598, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), review granted, 23 So. 3d 711 (Fla.2010); Robinson v. State, 989 So. 2d 747, 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Nigro v. Brady, 731 So. 2d 54, 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).…

Authorities Cited

• Blandin v. BAY Porte Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 988 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)