HERMAN SELINSKY, APPELLANT,

v.

ESTHER ANSHEN SELINSKY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pauline v. LEE, 147 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …ntial evidence to support the director’s findings and order of revocation, the director found against him and with this finding the Court agrees. In Florida Industrial Commission v. Nordin, Fla.App.1958; 101 So. 2d 890, and Cohen v. State, Fla.1957; 99 So. 2d 563, the Court held that where there is competent substantial evidence to support the findings of an administrative body it should not be disturbed on appeal. And in Trader Jon, Inc. v. State Beverage Department, et al., Fla.App. 1960, 119 So. 2d 735, t…
• Newman v. State, 174 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …t ordinarily review conflicting testimony, but only such absence of evidence as results in injury sufficient to amount to a departure from the essential requirements of law.” As more recently phrased by the supreme court in Cohen v. State, Fla.1957, 99 So. 2d 563, 565, “A judgment that has no competent substantial evidence to support it cannot and should not stand; and an affirmance of that judgment is such a departure from the essential requirements of law as to require this court, in the exercise of its an…
• Trader JON, Inc. v. State Bev. Dep't of Fla. & H. G. Cochran, Jr., 119 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
  …aving concluded that the Director’s order has no competent substantial evidence to support it, the circuit court’s order of affirmance is vacated. See Florida Industrial Commission v. Nordin, Fla.App. 1958, 101 So. 2d 890; Cohen v. State, Fla. 1957, 99 So. 2d 563. Reversed. WIGGINTON, C. J., and DREW, E. HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.…