JERRY SCHUSTER AND DAISY SCHUSTER, APPELLANTS,
v.
FOOD FAIR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON, J., concur.
PEARSON, J., dissents.
PEARSON, Judge,
(dissenting).
I base my dissent upon my interpretation of the summary judgment rule. The defendant presented affidavits upon which the trial judge could have been and in all probability was convinced that there was no negligence. The plaintiff relied solely upon her deposition taken by the defendant. This deposition was inconclusive upon the issue of negligence, but taken in its best possible light, set forth facts from which negligence might reasonably be inferred. It is my view that in this situation the judge should not upon motion for summary judgment determine that negligence does not exist.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marks v. Delcastillo, 386 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…ersons had used the property in question over a lengthy period of time, it is clear, as was held in Libby v. West Coast Rock Co., Inc., 308 So. 2d 602 (Fla.2d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 325 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1975), and Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Branham, 99 So. 2d 621 (Fla.3d DCA 1958), cert. dis [*1263] charged, 104 So. 2d 356 (Fla.1958), that the decedents were implied or uninvited licensees on the premises. See Morris v. Florida C.& P.R. Co., 43 Fla. 10, 29 So. 541 (1901); Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 4…
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Civil Cases-Report NO. 09-01 (Reorganization of the Civil Jury Instructions). In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 09-02 (Greater Weight of the Evidence, 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)…r should have known of the condition and risk by the use of reasonable care. NOTES ON USE FOR 401.16b 1. Byers v. Gunn, 81 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1955); Crutchfield v. Adams, 152 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Seaboard Air Line Railroad. Co. v. Branham, 99 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). 2. In the case of a person having an express or implied invitation, use instruction 401.16a instead of instruction 401.16b. As a result of Wood v. Camp, 284 So. 2d 691 (Fla.1973), the former licensee category now consists only o…
-
Seaboard AIR Line R.R. Co. & R. H. Williams v. Branham, 104 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1958)…rcuit Court to direct a verdict in their favor at the close of the plaintiff’s case in chief and at the end of the entire case. The District Court of Appeal, Third District, affirmed the judgment, Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Branham, Fla., 99 So. 2d 621, and the defendants thereupon petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to review the District Court decision on the ground that it “is in conflict with and, by implication, seeks to overrule this Court’s decision in Louisville & Nashville Rail…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence