LOUIS SCHULTZ, PETITIONER,
v.
NELEN FLOCKED FOLIAGES, INC., AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
LOUIS SCHULTZ, PETITIONER,
NELEN FLOCKED FOLIAGES, INC., AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
99 So. 2d 631
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Certiorari denied.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Other
On Rehearing Granted
PER CURIAM.
On rehearing granted and, after oral argument by counsel for both sides, it is ordered that the order of this Court of December 12, 1957, is vacated and the petition for attorneys’ fees filed by attorney for petitioner be and the same is hereby denied.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Platt A. Lasseter and Lora L. Lasseter v. Maxwell Dauer, 211 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…dingly, we reverse the order denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and remand the cause to the circuit court for consideration of award of damages if it is determined that defendants breached the contract. See Purcell v. Rothman, Fla.App. 1958, 99 So. 2d 631, 632, and Bliss v. Hallock, Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 889, 891. In the Purcell case the court said: “In a proper case where specific performance is sought by a purchaser, and for some reason is not granted, the court may proceed to determine that th…
-
Nichols v. MoAmCO Corp. & Silco Corp., 311 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…Nichols’ complaint and its exhibits from which the court may determine there was a contract between Nichols and MoAmCo4 and if so, to then determine the question of breach of contract and resultant damages. See Purcell v. Rothman, Fla.App. 3d 1958, 99 So. 2d 631; Lassiter v. Dauer, supra, and cases cited therein. Accordingly, the trial court’s order is affirmed insofar as it dismissed the appellant’s claim for specific performance in Count I, and for interference with an advantageous business relationship…
-
Gennaro v. Leeper, 313 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…l court. In addition to this, even though the reformed contract might not be subject to specific performance, the appellant might be entitled to damages if it is determined that appellee breached the contract. In Purcell v. Rothman, Fla.App.3d 1958, 99 So. 2d 631, cited with approval in Lasseter, supra, it was held: “In a proper case where specific performance is sought by a purchaser, and for some reason is not granted, the court may proceed to determine that there was a breach of contract on the part of t…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence