GREGORY RUFF, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant cannot be sentenced as a habitual felony offender for a conviction of possession of a controlled substance.
[1] A defendant cannot be sentenced as a habitual felony offender for a felony conviction that is a violation of section 893.13 relating to the purchase or possession of a co…
[2] A sentence imposed under the habitual felony offender statute may be vacated and remanded for resentencing when the underlying offense is a violation of section 893.13 re…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was convicted of several drug offenses, including possession of cocaine. The trial court sentenced him as a habitual felony offender for all…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Possession Of A Controlled Substance cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAHOOD, C.J.
Appellant, Gregory Ruff, appeals his sentence for possession of cocaine. Ruff urges the trial court erred by sentencing appellant as a habitual felony offender for possession of cocaine.
Appellee, State of Florida, concedes and we agree that appellant’s sentence for possession of cocaine should be vacated and remanded for resentencing.
Appellant was charged by Information with two counts of trafficking in oxycodone under section 893.135(l)(c)l.b, Florida Statutes (2003), one count of delivering cocaine under section 893.13(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2003), and one count of possession of cocaine under section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2003). A jury found him guilty on all counts. The trial court adjudicated him guilty of the offenses. When appellant was sentenced, the trial court declared appellant a habitual felony offender and sentenced him as a habitual felony offender to concurrent prison terms of thirty years for the trafficking offenses, with the applicable mandatory minimum terms, thirty years for delivery of cocaine, and ten years for possession of cocaine.
Section 775.084(l)(a)3., Florida Statutes (2003), provides:
(1) As used in this act:
(a) “Habitual felony offender” means a defendant for whom the court may impose an extended term of imprisonment, as provided in paragraph (4)(a), if it finds that:
3. The felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced, and one of the two prior felony convictions, is not a violation of s. 893.13 relating to the purchase or the possession of a controlled substance.
In Coleman v. State, 927 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), the court held: “Section 775.084(l)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2003), precludes sentencing a defendant as a habitual felony offender for violating section 893.13 relating to purchase or possession of a controlled substance.” Therefore, pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a)3. and Coleman, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing on the possession of cocaine count under the criminal punishment code.
Reversed and Remanded for Resentenc-ing.
POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.