ROBERT WHITNEY, D.C., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
There is no basis in the evidence or law to support the determinations below that the appellant, a chiropractor, violated § 460.413(l)(d), Fla. Stat.1 See Rosenberg v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 488 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Sherman v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., 452 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (Anstead, C.J., concurring specially); see also Pub. Health Trust of Dade Co. v. Lopez, 531 So. 2d 946 (Fla.1988); Hotel & Rest. Comm’n v. Sunny Seas No. One, Inc., 104 So. 2d 570 (Fla.1958). Accordingly, the order imposing discipline upon appellant is reversed for dismissal of the proceeding below.
Reversed.
. "The following acts constitute grounds for denial of a license or disciplinary action, as specified in s. 456.072(2): ... (d) False, deceptive, or misleading advertising.”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty. v. Lopez, 531 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1988)
- Hotel & Rest. Comm'n v. Sunny Seas NO. ONE, Inc., 104 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1958)
- Sherman v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 452 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Isabella Noel v. Schoninger, 488 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Rosenberg v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 488 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)