MICHAEL A. COGEN, APPELLANT,
v.
KIRSTEN W. COGEN, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find that it was error to award rehabilitative alimony where the former wife failed to present evidence of a rehabilitative plan. See Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Fullerton v. Fullerton, 709 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
On remand, the trial court is to recalculate child support based on the parties’ respective incomes as previously determined by the general magistrate.1 The final judgment is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.
MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur. . The case was tried before a general magistrate. Her report and recommendations were approved and adopted by the trial court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rocka Fuerta Constr. Inc. v. Southwick, Inc., 103 So. 3d 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…he dismissal order simply indicated that “[t]he case is dismissed and the court reserves as to other sanctions.” Thus, the appeal as to this issue is premature. See Cummings v. Campbell, 7 So. 3d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Harrison v. Gattozzi, 992 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Ross v. Blank, 958 So. 2d 437, 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Adlow, Inc. v. Mauda, Inc., 632 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). However, given our reversal of the order dismissing Rocka’s suit, this issue is most likely moot. For…
-
Vitale v. Anne Vitale, 31 So. 3d 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…hus, [*974] after denying the petition, the trial court erred in using the prevailing party standard to award the former wife attorney’s fees for the holiday visitation petition, rather than the general family law standard. See Harrison v. Gattozzi, 992 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (stating that the prevailing party attorney fee provision of the marital settlement agreement was “applicable only to actions to enforce the marital settlement agreement,” not to the father’s attempts to modify the agreement…
-
Sacket v. Sacket, 115 So. 3d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…s entitlement to attorney’s fees for the work performed on her emergency motion, using the standard for attorney’s fees awards under section 61.16, Florida Statutes, for the entirety of the motion. See Vitale, 31 So. 3d at 973; Harrison v. Gattozzi, 992 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). If the trial court again determines that the former wife is entitled to attorney’s fees, it should determine the reasonable amount of fees incurred in connection with the emergency motion, and set the manner in which the fo…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Fullerton v. Fullerton, 709 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)