J.L., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that the juvenile knowingly made a false report concerning the placement of a bomb, as required by the statute.
A juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for making a false bomb report. The arresting officer testified the juvenile confessed to making a 'bomb threat,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Construction cases and more on FLexlaw
EVANDER, J.
J.L. was adjudicated delinquent after being found guilty of making a false report concerning the placement of a bomb in violation of section 790.163(1), Florida Statutes (2007). He contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient to support a finding of guilt. We agree.
Section 790.163(1) provides:
It is unlawful for any person to make a false report, with intent to deceive, mislead, or otherwise misinform any person, concerning the placing or planting of any bomb, dynamite, other deadly explosive, or weapon of mass destruction....
The statute is therefore violated when a person knowingly makes a false report that a bomb or other deadly explosive has been placed or planted. By contrast, a threat to plant a bomb in the distant future does not violate this statute. D.B. v. State, 825 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
In the instant case, the arresting law enforcement officer testified that she had been advised by dispatch that a “bomb threat” had been made to Life Skills Center. After conducting a search, the officer determined that there was no bomb placed at this location. The officer then conducted an investigation which eventually resulted in the questioning of J.L. According to the officer, J.L. “did confess to making a bomb threat.” However, even after being given the opportunity to reopen its case, the State failed to present any evidence as to the words actually used in the “bomb threat.” Absent some evidence of the words used by J. L., we conclude that the State failed to meet its burden of proof. In so holding, we do not suggest that the State was required to establish the exact words used by J.L. But the State must present more than a witness’ conclusionary statement that a “bomb threat” was made. Here, it simply cannot be determined from the evidence whether J.L. knowingly made a false report regarding the placement of a bomb.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
L. C. v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…n intention to inflict pain, harm, or punishment" or "[a]n indication of impending danger or harm." American Heritage Dictionary 1813 (5th ed. 2011). As troubling as such a threat may be, it is not proscribed by the statute. Cf. J.L. v. State, 993 So. 2d 103, 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ("Section 790.163(1) . . . is therefore violated when a person knowingly makes a false report that a bomb or other deadly explosive has been placed or planted. By contrast, a threat to plant a bomb in the distant future…
-
J.A.W. v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)…ion between a statement that “there is a bomb in the building” and a statement, such as [the defendant’s], that ‘I’m going to blow up the building.’” Id. at 1043 (quoting Moosavi v. State, 736 A. 2d 285, 291-92 (Md. 1999)). See also J.L. v. State, 993 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (recognizing that “a threat to plant a bomb in the distant future does not violate [§ 790.163(1)]”). Applying D.B. here, the firearms-related prohibition in § 790.163(1) plainly prohibits knowingly false and misleading reports ab…
Authorities Cited
- D.B. v. State, 825 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)