BON TON LAUNDRY
v.
L. S. GAULDEN, ASS'T. CITY ATT'Y., WEST PALM BEACH

Fla. | 1933-08-08
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
111 Fla. 729 Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Also reported at: 149 So. 583

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court modified a prior supersedeas order, clarifying the conditions under which an injunction against a laundry's operation would be suspended pending appeal. The modification required the appellant to cease using wood fuel, as certified by the Circuit Judge, in addition to posting a bond.


Holding

Yes, the order of supersedeas should be modified to require the appellant to cease using wood fuel as a means of producing steam for the laundry's operation, as certified by the Circuit Judge, in addition to posting a bond.


Key Quotes

“Upon an inspection of a certified transcript of the record filed upon an application for an order of supersedeas in the above styled cause, it is ordered that the appeal entered in said cause on the 20th day of July, 1933, do operate as a supersedeas upon the giving and filing of bond and security the amount and conditions of which shall be fixed by the Circuit Judge, said bond so given to be approved as required by law.”

Establishes the initial conditions for the supersedeas, including bond requirements.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The appellant, Bon Ton Laundry, appealed an injunction order that enjoined its operation. The laundry sought a supersedeas order to suspend the injunc…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Motion having been made to vacate the order of supersedeas herein, and the same having been argued by counsel, upon consideration thereof it is ordered by the Court that the order of supersedeas heretofore entered herein be modified to read as follows:

*730“Upon an inspection of a certified transcript of the record filed upon an application for an order of supersedeas in the above styled cause, it is ordered that the appeal entered in said cause on the 20th day of July, 1933, do operate as a supersedeas upon the giving and filing of bond and security the amount and conditions of which shall be fixed by the Circuit Judge, said bond so given to be approved as required by law. It is further ordered that such supersedeas shall have the effect to suspend the injunction order or decree appealed from in said cause upon the giving and filing of the bond and security hereinbefore specified and upon condition that the appellant shall make it to appear to the Circuit Judge and procure from him a certificate that appellants have discontinued using in the laundry whose operation has been enjoined as a nuisance in fact, the use of wood fuel as a means of producing steam for the operation of their said plant.”

It is further ordered that this cause shall be considered as advanced on the docket to be taken up for consideration as soon as practicable after the completion of the filing of all briefs by the parties herein.

Ordered accordingly.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw