ARIE DONKERSLOOT, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE HELENA J. DONKERSLOOT TRUST, AND ANGIE D. HALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE HELENA J. DONKERSLOOT TRUST, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
JOHANNES DONKERSLOOT, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 2d DCA | 2008-10-22
No. 2D07-3166
WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
993 So. 2d 126 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2008)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Arie Donkersloot, Sr. appeals an amended final judgment awarding attorney's fees and costs against him for breach of fiduciary duty. The court reverses the fee award against Donkersloot because no motion sought such relief and equity cannot override the bright-line requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525.


Holding

A trial court may not award attorney's fees and costs against a party absent a proper motion requesting such relief under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525. Although a trial court has equitable powers, equity does not authorize circumventing the bright-line procedural requirements of Rule 1.525 by awarding unrequested relief.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court may not award relief that has not been requested or tried by consent.

[2] A party seeking an award of attorney's fees or costs must serve a motion requesting them within thirty days after entry of the judgment.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a trial court may not award relief that has not been requested nor tried by consent”

Establishes the core principle that a trial court lacks authority to award unrequested relief, even in equity.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Johannes Donkersloot sued his father Arie Donkersloot, Sr. and sister Angie D. Hall, who were co-successor-trustees of trusts created under a Revocabl…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.

LaROSE, Judge.

Arie Donkersloot, Sr., appeals an amended final judgment that awarded attorney’s fees and costs against him for breach of fiduciary duty. He argues that no motion sought such relief and that the trial court’s equitable award of such relief was error. We agree and reverse that portion of the amended final judgment that assessed attorney’s fees and costs against Mr. Donkersloot.

Underlying this appeal is a Revocable Living Trust Agreement and Family Trust Agreement. Several years of litigation ensued when Johannes Donkersloot sued his father, Mr. Donkersloot, and sister, Angie D. Hall, co-successor-trustees. Ultimately, the trial court ordered certain property returned to the trusts, removed Mr. Donk-ersloot and Ms. Hall as co-successor-trustees, and ordered an accounting.

The trial court reserved jurisdiction to determine the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs against Mr. Donkersloot and Ms. Hall. Subsequently, Johannes Donkersloot moved for attorney’s fees and costs against Ms. Hall. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.525. He sought neither fees nor costs against his father. Prior to the motion hearing, counsel for Mr. Donkersloot and Johannes Donker-sloot stipulated that neither Mr. Donker-sloot nor his counsel needed to be present. Mr. Donkersloot’s counsel attended the hearing briefly, alerted the trial court to the stipulation, and, with leave of court, left the hearing. As the hearing progressed, Johannes Donkersloot, in response to trial court questioning, opined that the trial court “in equity” could award fees and costs against Mr. Donkersloot. Several months later, the trial court entered the amended final judgment awarding almost $195,000 in attorney’s fees, costs, and interest against Ms. Hall and Mr. Donker-sloot, jointly and severally. On rehearing, the trial court rejected Mr. Donkersloot’s argument that the fees could not be imposed absent a proper motion.

The trial court concluded that the award was warranted against Mr. Donkersloot as part of the “action in equity.”

Once a party pleads entitlement to attorney’s fees, proof of the fees may be presented after final judgment upon motion made within a reasonable time. Stockman v. Downs, 573 So. 2d 835, 838 (Fla.1991). However, a trial court may not award relief that has not been requested nor tried by consent. Conidaris v. Cresswood Servs., Inc., 779 So. 2d 518, 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that trial court was without authority to order owners to pay where equitable remedy was neither sought nor tried by consent).

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525 dictates that a party seeking an award of attorney’s fees or costs must serve a motion requesting them within thirty days after entry of the judgment. Undisputedly, Johannes Donkersloot filed a timely motion. His motion did not seek fees from Mr. Donkersloot, nor was the motion served on him. Equally clear is the fact that, by stipulation, neither Mr. Donkersloot nor his counsel needed to be present at the hearing on attorney’s fees and costs; there was no trial by consent. Nor was the fee award an action that the trial court could make “in equity.” Equity does not breathe into a rule 1.525 motion unrequested relief. See generally Gulf Landings Ass’n, Inc. v. Hershberger, 845 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that rule 1.525 is a bright-line rule and eschewing equitable exceptions).

Accordingly, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees and costs as to Mr. Donkersloot.

We find no merit in the arguments advanced on appeal by Ms. Hall or on cross-appeal by Johannes Donkersloot. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s amended final judgment in all respects, except for the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs against Arie Donkersloot, Sr. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw