DESMOND SAWYERR, APPELLANT,
v.
SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Desmond Sawyerr appealed a summary judgment in favor of Southeastern University in his breach of employment contract action. The court reversed, finding genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether Sawyerr's letter constituted insubordination justifying termination or rejection of the employment offer.
Summary judgment was improper because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether Sawyerr's letter constitutes insubordination or a rejection of the employment offer. When viewing evidence favorably to the nonmoving party and drawing inferences in his favor, summary judgment cannot be granted where such factual disputes remain.
[1] Summary judgment is proper only when there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
[2] All doubts and inferences shall be resolved in favor of the nonmoving party when considering a motion for summary judgment.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Summary judgment is proper 'only when there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
Establishes the controlling standard for summary judgment that must be satisfied before judgment can be entered without trial.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSawyerr filed a breach of contract claim alleging Southeastern offered and he accepted an employment agreement for the 2006-2007 academic year. Southe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse De Novo Review Of Summary Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
[*142] STRINGER, Judge.
Desmond Sawyerr seeks review of the Order Granting Summary Judgment and Entering Final Judgment for Defendant Southeastern University, Inc., in Sawyerr’s action for breach of employment contract against Southeastern. We conclude there exists a genuine issue of material fact and reverse and remand for further proceedings.
An order granting summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Gallagher v. Dupont, 918 So. 2d 342, 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Summary judgment is proper “only when there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Galaxy Fireworks, Inc. v. Bush, 927 So. 2d 995, 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). All doubts and inferences shall be resolved in favor of the nonmoving party, and the slightest doubt or conflict in the evidence will preclude summary judgment. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, Inc., 964 So. 2d 261, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
In this case, Sawyerr filed a breach of contract claim against Southeastern, alleging that Southeastern offered and he accepted an employment agreement for the 2006-2007 academic year. Sawyerr alleges Southeastern thereafter terminated the contract and breached its duty to employ and/or compensate Sawyerr for the period of time covered by the employment agreement. Southeastern alleges it properly withdrew the offer or terminated Saw-yerr’s employment for cause based on Sawyerr’s insubordinate behavior, as evidenced in his February 20, 2006, letter to the Vice President for Academic Affairs.
The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of Southeastern, finding the undisputed evidence in the record shows that Sawyerr either never accepted the offer or that the offer was properly rescinded for insubordination. We hold the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Viewing the evidence most favorably to Sawyerr and drawing every possible inference in his favor, we find there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether Sawyerr’s letter constitutes insubordination or a rejection of the employment offer. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harbiya K. Abu-Khadier v. THE City of Fort Myers (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…uded that no compensation was due for the one-year closure. Because the unrebutted testimony from the NAB hearing supports the circuit court's conclusion, we affirm. We review an order granting summary judgment de novo. Sawyerr v. Se. Univ., Inc., 993 So. 2d 141, 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Summary judgment is proper when the movant establishes an absence of a genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Id. All doubts and inferences must be resolved in favor of the nonmovin…
-
Pirate's Treasure, Inc. v. City of Dunedin (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Gallagher v. Dupont, 918 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, Inc., 964 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Galaxy Fireworks, Inc. v. The Honorable Jeb Bush, 927 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)