STEVEN FLANDERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a defendant must be given an opportunity to amend a facially insufficient motion for postconviction relief, especially on a first motion.
Steven Flanders appealed the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Alibi Witness cases and more on FLexlaw
[*384] PER CURIAM.
Steven Flanders (Flanders) appeals the trial courts summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We find merit in ground one of Flanders motion, and, therefore, affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
In ground one, Flanders argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because defense counsel, among other things, failed to call an alibi witness. To assert a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call a witness, the defendant must (1) identify the prospective witness, (2) describe the substance of the witness testimony, (3) state that the witness was available to testify, and (4) describe the prejudice resulting from omitting the witness testimony. See Nelson v. State, 875 So. 2d 579 (Fla.2004).
Here, Flanders motion fails to make the necessary allegations. Thus, the trial court correctly determined the motion to be facially insufficient. However, because this is Flanders first motion for postcon-viction relief, the trial court should have given Flanders an opportunity to amend his motion to cure the pleading defect. See Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla.2007).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial courts order summarily denying Flanders relief as to ground one. On remand, the trial court should allow Flanders a reasonable time to file an amended and legally sufficient motion. If Flanders does not file an amended motion, the denial may be reinstated. If Flanders cures the defects on an amended motion, the trial court should either hold an evidentiary hearing on whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call the alibi witness or attach to any subsequent order summarily denying relief those portions of the record conclusively refuting his claim.
We affirm as to grounds two and three. See Parker v. State, 611 So. 2d 1224, 1226 (Fla.1992).
Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded with instructions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 203 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…the witness was available to testify at trial; 3) describes the substance of the witness’ testimony; and 4) describes the prejudice resulting from the witness’ failure to testify, Nelson v. State, [*918] 875 So. 2d 579 (Fla.2004); Flanders v. State, 994 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). ‘ . See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (establishing the two-prong test for ineffective assistance of trial counsel). , Because our holding is limited to the determination tha…
Authorities Cited
- Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007)
- Nelson v. State, 875 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2004)
- Parker v. State, 611 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 1992)
- Gholston v. State, 611 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 1992)