ARTHUR PHILLIPS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Phillips challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for credit for county jail time. On appeal, this Court must reverse unless the records attached to the trial court’s order conclusively demonstrate that the defendant is not entitled to the requested relief. See Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460, 460-61 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (reversing the summary denial of the defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion because the trial court “did not attach to its order portions of the transcript conclusively demonstrating that defendant waived entitlement to credit for time served in prison”); Perez-Boza v. State, 943 So. 2d 291, 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record ... shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief.”). Because nothing is attached to the trial court’s summary denial of Phillips’ pro se motion, we reverse and remand for entry of a new order supported by record attachments.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Matheson v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 187 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…le and ballot summary,” and as to count III because Matheson .had made no argument as to it. This appeal ensued. 3. Legal Analysis The standard of review of the instant final summary judgment is de novo. See Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Vill. of Pinecrest, 994 So. 2d 456, 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (applying a de novo standard of review in determining whether a local referendum [*240] complied with the accuracy requirements of section 101.161 of the Florida Statutes). Florida law requires that every ballot initiative p…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Rainer Perez-Boza v. State, 943 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)