RONALD E. KNAUSE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2008-10-07
No. 1D08-3935
BARFIELD, ALLEN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
994 So. 2d 1169 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 11, 2008, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal failed to timely invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Proctor v. State, 845 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion to Consolidate, filed on August 8, 2008, is denied as moot.

BARFIELD, ALLEN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cash v. Cash, 122 So. 3d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
    …)(a); see also Whittingham v. Whittingham, 67 So. 3d 239, 239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Here, the court’s finding is insufficient. See Swanston v. Swanston, 746 So. 2d 566, 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); cf. Hodge, 754 So. 2d at 847. See generally Hall v. Hall, 994 So. 2d 1169, 1171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“[Djeviation from the guidelines normally is justified where a child’s special needs call for more support.”). II. Failure to impute income to former wife In the supplemental final judgment the court did not impute incom…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw