WILLIE MELVIN BEDFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Exclusive Possession cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of possession with intent to sell both cocaine and marijuana. He challenges his convictions claiming that the trial court erred in failing to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal. He maintains that the state failed to prove that he had knowledge of the drugs found inside a container which an officer observed appellant hide. In addition, he also claims that the state faded to prove intent to sell. As to knowledge of the drugs, because the officer saw appellant in actual possession of the container in which the drugs were found, knowledge may be inferred from the exclusive possession of the substance. See Gartrell v. State, 626 So. 2d 1364, 1366 (Fla.1993).
As to inferring intent to sell, the circumstantial evidence observed by the officer, including the number of packages of drugs found, together with the officer’s testimony that the number and type of packaging was consistent with the sale of drugs, was sufficient to submit the issue of intent to the jury. See Bruce v. State, 616 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
The trial court did not err in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. We therefore affirm.
WARNER, FARMER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richards v. State, 37 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…41 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (conviction reversed where State offered no testimony that amount of cocaine possessed was inconsistent with personal use). Richards’ motion for judgment of acquittal was appropriately denied. See Bedford v. State, 995 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). The appellant’s second point on appeal is without merit. Affirmed. GROSS, C.J., concurs. FARMER, J., dissents with opinion.…
-
Angelia Evette Harris v. State, 72 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…possessed a coin purse containing seven small plastic bags of white powdery substance, one of which tested positive for cocaine, and the officer testified that the defendant’s method of storage was inconsistent with personal use); Bedford v. State, 995 So. 2d 1122, 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“As to inferring intent to sell, the circumstantial evidence observed by the officer, including the number of packages of drugs found, together with the officer’s testimony that the number and type of packaging was consist…
-
Wood v. State, 12 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Bedford v. State, 995 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); State v. Odom, 862 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). HAWKES, C.J., ALLEN, AND CLARK, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Gartrell v. State, 626 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1993)
- Bruce v. State, 616 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)