JOSEPH C. PARZYCK, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2008-12-10
No. 2D08-2327
KELLY, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
995 So. 2d 1164 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the postconviction court summarily denying Joseph Parzyck’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Parzyck may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion, within sixty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case, alleging that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress the firearm. Such a motion shall not be considered successive.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw