KLEINMAN, ET AL
v.
ETHERIDGE, ET AL.

Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. | 1979-10-07
No. 79-7842 (08)
49 Fla. Supp. 163 Dade County Circuit Court (1979)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Plaintiffs sued Dade County alleging negligence by a court clerk's employee who released sealed criminal record information, seeking to hold the county vicariously liable under respondeat superior. The court dismissed the complaint, holding that the clerk of circuit court is a constitutionally independent officer of the judicial branch whom the county cannot supervise or control, defeating any basis for vicarious liability.


Holding

Dade County cannot be held liable because the clerk of the circuit court is a constitutionally independent officer of the judicial branch, not subject to county supervision or control. Vicarious liability under respondeat superior requires an essential element of power to control, which Dade County lacks over the clerk's court-related duties.


Headnotes

[1] A county government cannot be held vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the negligent acts of a clerk of the circuit court or their employees…

[2] The clerk of the circuit court is an independent constitutional officer and a ministerial officer of the judicial branch of state government, not subject to the control o…

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior rests upon the essential element of the power to control.”

Establishes the foundational requirement for vicarious liability that Dade County cannot satisfy.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A deputy court clerk allegedly provided a certified copy of sealed court records containing plaintiff's prior arrest information to co-defendant Ether…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
FRANCIS X. KNUCK, Circuit Judge.

FRANCIS X. KNUCK, Circuit Judge.

Final judgment for defendant Dade County: This matter came before the court originally on defendant Dade County’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that the co-defendant Etheridge obtained from a deputy court clerk a certified copy of a portion of the court record in a county court criminal proceeding which indicated plaintiff’s prior arrest, notwithstanding the sealing of the court file by court order. It is further alleged that the release of such information by the clerk’s employee was therefore negligent and that defendant Dade County is vicariously liable for such negligence by the clerk’s employee. The clerk of the circuit court is also named as a defendant in this action.

Plaintiffs’ theory for holding Dade County liable is based on the doctrine of respondeat superior, and no other basis appears in the complaint. In order for defendant Dade County to be held liable for the acts of the clerk of the circuit court or his employees, it must be shown that said defendant has the authority to supervise and control the conduct of the clerk and his employees in the performance of their duties related to the administration of the courts. Liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior rests upon the essential element of the power to control. Courbier v. Miami Daily News, Inc., 265 So.2d 743, 745 (Fla. 3 DCA 1972); Sapp v. U.S., 227 F.2d 280 (5 Cir. 1955); McQuillan, Municipal Corporations, §53.66 (3d Ed. rev.).

The clerk of the circuit court is an independent constitutional officer elected by the people. Fla. Const. Art. V §16; Art. VIII §l(d.) Unlike other public offices in Dade County, the office of clerk of the circuit court may not be abolished by county charter. Fla. Const. (1885) Art. VIII §11 (f); Fla. Const. (1972) Art. VIII §6(e). The clerk of the circuit court may appoint deputies for whose acts he shall be liable. Fla. Stat. §28.06. The clerk of the circuit court is also the clerk of the county court, Fla. Stat. §34.031, and he may, with the concurrence of the chief judge of the circuit, appoint deputy clerks for the county court for whose acts the clerk shall be liable. Fla. Stat. §34.032. In the event of a vacancy occurring in the office of clerk of the circuit court, the judge of that court shall appoint a clerk ad interim. Fla. Stat. §28.09. The clerk is a ministerial officer of the court. Pan American World Airways v. Gregory, 96 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3 DCA 1957).

*165It is clear as a matter of law that the clerk of the circuit court functions as an officer or agent of the judicial branch of state government and cannot be controlled in the exercise of his court related duties by any county government. Inasmuch as defendant Dade County therefore lacks the power to control the conduct of the clerk of the circuit court or his employees with respect to the acts or omissions alleged in the complaint, said defendant cannot be held liable therefor.

On June 20, 1979, the court entered an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action for the reasons stated above. Said order allowed a period of twenty days within which plaintiff could file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, and defendant Dade County has moved for entry of judgment in its favor. That motion should be granted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that plaintiffs Herbert Kleinman and Laura Natter take nothing by their action against defendant Dade County and that defendant Dade County go hence without day.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw