TERRANCE TERRELL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unpreserved Error cases and more on FLexlaw
We affirm in all respects Terrance Terrell Williams’ conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a church in trial court case number 2007-CF-3818 as well as his convictions and sentences for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a church and sale of cannabis within 1000 feet of a church in trial court case number 2007-CF-4151. We also affirm the order imposing the public defender’s fee in trial court case number 2007-CF-3818. We note, however, that the written judgment in trial court case number 2007-CF-4151 contains an unpreserved scrivener’s error. Although it is clear that count four of the amended information charged Williams with second-degree felony sale of cannabis within 1000 feet of a church and it is equally clear that the trial court at all times treated this charge as a second-degree felony, the written judgment mistakenly lists the degree of the offense as “FI” rather than “F2.”
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Westphal v. City OF ST. Petersburg/City OF ST. Petersburg Risk Mgmt., 122 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…ing PTD benefits before she reaches overall MMI must prove she has a present total disability and that said disability will exist after the date of MMI.”); Crum v. Richmond, 46 So. 3d 633, 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Fla. Trans. 1982, Inc. v. Quintana, 1 So. 3d 388, 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Quite apart from the majority opinion’s unjustified disregard of an unbroken fifteen-year line of precedent — and the unprecedented use of the en banc rule in this case — the new substantive rule of decision the majority o…1 / 2
-
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…abnormality or loss determined as a percentage of the body as whole, existing after the date of maximum medical improvement, which results from an injury.” § 440.02(22), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). . See, e.g., Fla. Transp.1982, Inc. v. Quintana, 1 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Olmo v. Rehabcare Stamted/SRS, 930 So. 2d at 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Rivendell of Ft. Walton v. Petway, 833 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Metro. Title & Guar. Co. v. Muniz, 806 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); McDevitt St. Bov…
-
Warmington v. State, 86 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…uted improper burden shifting. See id. at 265 (citing Jackson v. State, 575 So. 2d 181, 188 (Fla.1991) (reversing a conviction where the prosecutor commented on the defendant’s failure to call a particular witness to testify)). In Ramirez v. State, 1 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), also cited by the defendant, Ramirez was charged with battery on a law enforcement officer during the course of the booking process into the local jail. Id. at 384. Law enforcement personnel testified they physically subdued Ram…