RAYMOND OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAYMOND OWENS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
1 So. 3d 405
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Raymond Owens challenges his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm without comment. However, it appears that, after granting Owens’ Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion to correct illegal sentence, the post-conviction court failed to enter an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation. Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation that reflect the correct cost amounts. See Jackson v. State, 950 So .2d 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bassett v. State, 23 So. 3d 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…lecting such. On remand, the trial court should strike the costs that were not originally imposed and enter an amended costs order, an amended judgment and sentence, and an amended order of probation reflecting the correct costs. See Owens v. State, 1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Redilla, 929 So. 2d at 614. Affirmed; remanded with directions. KELLY and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.…
-
Hayes v. State, 53 So. 3d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…nal Procedure 3.800(b) and ordered that the public defender fee be reduced from $200 to $100. See § 938.29(l)(a), (5), Fla. Stat. (2008). However, the trial court failed to enter an amended cost order reflecting the reduced cost. See Owens v. State, 1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (remanding for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order that reflected the correct cost amounts). Affirmed; remanded with directions. SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ„ Concur.…
-
Headrick v. State, 72 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…hould be entered to reflect that the trial court struck the regional counsel fee of $200, the fine of $125.72, and the fine surcharge of $6.28. Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order. See Owens v. State, 1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Judgments and sentences affirmed, and case remanded for entry of an amended cost order. NORTHCUTT and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- S.H. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 950 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)