KERSEY
v.
VERO INDIAN RIVER PRODUCERS ASS'N., ET AL.

Fla. Industrial Comm'n | 1953-10-12
Chairman JAMES T. VOCELLE, Commissioner H. E. WOLFE and Commissioner L. R. WESTON participated in the disposition of this matter.
5 Fla. Supp. 44 Florida Industrial Commission (1953)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A claimant cannot compromise and settle for less than awarded compensation, and the deputy commissioner's order approving such a stipulation is reversed.


Facts & Procedural History

A deputy commissioner awarded compensation for permanent partial disability. Subsequently, the parties submitted a stipulation for a lesser sum, which…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BY THE COMMISSION:

*45BY THE COMMISSION:

This cause came on to be heard on an application for réview of an order and an amendment thereto entered by a deputy commissioner awarding compensation. The order is dated June 25, 1953 and the amendment July 6, 1953, and held in part that claimant had a permanent partial disability of 80%, awarding compensation on that basis. Application for review was timely filed and the matter entered on the review docket of this commission.

Prior to a review by the commission the parties submitted a stipulation to the deputy for approval pursuant to which claimant agreed to accept a sum less than that ordered to be paid by the deputy commissioner. The deputy approved the stipulation as being in the claimant’s best interest. The parties now request the commission to dismiss the pending application for review.

In our opinion a claimant cannot compromise and settle for a sum less than that which has been awarded to him. In this case the claimant is entitled to the compensation specified in the deputy’s order, as amended, unless it can be shown that the order was based on an erroneous application of law or that there is no substantial, competent evidence in support thereof.

The deputy commissioner’s order approving the stipulation (mailed on August 19,1953) is reversed, and it is ordered that the deputy commissioner’s order herein dated June 25, 1953 and the amendment thereto dated July 6, 1953 be and they are hereby reinstated and made of full force and effect. We retain jurisdiction of the matter and will review the cause on its merits if the carrier requests us to do so.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw