CLINTON BLACK, APPELLANT,

v.

LAKESKA KELSEY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Nassau Cnty. v. Lynwood G. Willis and Jane T. Willis, 41 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …ion usually does not uniquely harm the individual plaintiff. Rather, the statute simply requires a citizen/plaintiff to have a particularized interest of the kind contemplated by the statute.... Save Homosassa River Alliance, Inc. v. Citrus County, 2 So. 3d 329, 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), review denied, 16 So. 3d 132 (Fla.2009). Prior to the enactment of section 163.3215, limitations on standing resulted in “a failure to conform development decisions to the plan based upon the fact that citizens lacked stand…
• Landmark Funding, Inc v. Chaluts, 213 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
  …4 So. 3d 484, 490-92 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (reversing dismissal of legal malpractice complaint that alleged ultimate facts showing that plaintiffs had standing as intended third-party beneficiaries); cf. Save Homosassa River All., Inc. v. Citrus Cty., 2 So. 3d 329, 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (Pleus, J. dissenting) (noting requirement that complaint allege ultimate facts showing the plaintiff’s standing (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 1.110(b); Williams v. Howard, 329 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1976))). The trial court nonethele…
• Martin Cnty. Conservation Alliance & 1000 Friends of Fla., Inc. v. Martin Cnty., 134 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …(Fla. 1st DCA 2001); O’Connell v. Fla. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs, 874 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Fla. Wildlife Fed’n v. St. Johns County, 909 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). While appellants cite Save the Homosassa River Alliance v. Citrus County, 2 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), in support of their claim of standing, this case is inapposite as it addresses the standing requirements for a circuit court proceeding pursuant to section 163.3215, Florida Statutes. Section 163.3215 is a remedial statute desig…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)