ANTONIO DESHAWN WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Forcible Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
Antonio Williams appeals from his judgment and life sentence for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery. We affirm his conviction without comment. As for his life sentence, Williams, citing Tumblin v. State, 965 So.2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), argues that he does not qualify for Prison Releasee Reoffender (PRR) sentencing under section 775.082, Florida Statutes (2005). Specifically, Williams argues his offense is not a “forcible felony” that would qualify him for PRR sentencing under section 775.082(9)(a)(l)(o). Although we agree, and the State concedes, that Williams does not qualify for PRR sentencing under subsection (o), because Williams did not preserve this sentencing error, we affirm but do so without prejudice to Williams’ right to file an appropriate postconviction motion. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452 (Fla.2003).
Affirmed.
FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SAM Rodgers Props., Inc. v. Chmura, 61 So. 3d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…SRP), appeals an amended final judgment entered in favor of Linda Lan Chmura in the amount of $355,742.55, plus interest. We affirm the portion of the amended final judgment that complies with our prior mandate in Chmura v. Sam Rodgers Props., Inc., 2 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), which orders that the previous foreclosure sale and certificate of title be vacated and set aside. However, because we find that there was a legally binding written contract between the parties and both a valid original claim of…
-
Saewitz v. Saewitz, 79 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…a motion to compel the records. A sanction remedy for failure to allow discovery is legally unavailable to a party until the opposing party is first subject to and violates an order to provide such discovery. See Chmura v. Sam Rodgers Props., Inc., 2 So. 3d 984, 987 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“Where a party has never been instructed by the court to comply with any discovery request, sanctions for noncompliance are inappropriate.”) (quoting Thomas v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 875 So. 2d 758, 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)).…
-
Bechtel Corp. v. Batchelor, 250 So. 3d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…allow discovery is legally unavailable to a party until the opposing party is first subject to and violates an order to provide such discovery." Saewitz v. Saewitz, 79 So. 3d 831, 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). See also Chmura v. Sam Rodgers Props., Inc., 2 So. 3d 984, 987 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ("Where a party has never been instructed by the court to comply with any discovery request, sanctions for noncompliance are inappropriate.") (quoting Thomas v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 875 So. 2d 758, 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ).…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2003)
- Tavorris Tumblin v. State, 965 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)