GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A., FRANCIS B. BROGAN, JR., ESQ. AND ANTHONY D'ANDREA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANCIS D'ANDREA, JR., IRREVOCABLE TRUST, PETITIONERS,
v.
TERYSE BRESNAHAN, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 2009-02-18
No. 4D08-3392
FARMER, STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
2 So. 3d 1109 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2009)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Greenberg Traurig sought certiorari review of a discovery order requiring production of unredacted attorney-client communications. The court granted relief in part, holding that a limited waiver of privilege by a client asserting an advice-of-counsel defense does not extend to all documents, and that internal firm records and billing information retain privileged status.


Holding

The court held that a limited waiver of attorney-client privilege applies only to the transaction surrounding the specific property at issue in the underlying litigation and does not extend to documents beyond that scope. Internal law firm housekeeping information and billing entries remain confidential despite a partial waiver of privilege.


Headnotes

[1] A limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege applies only to the specific subject matter expressly covered by the waiver.

[2] Internal housekeeping information and billing entries, including fee amounts, may remain confidential even when other aspects of attorney-client communications are disclo…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“D'Andrea's limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege applied only to the transaction surrounding the specific property at issue in the underlying litigation.”

Establishes the limited scope of waiver when client asserts advice-of-counsel defense

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Anthony D'Andrea, a trustee of his father's irrevocable trust represented by Greenberg Traurig, was sued by siblings seeking his removal and alleging …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of a discovery order that directs the Record Custodian of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. to produce unredacted documents. We grant relief in part as there is information within the documents that retain privileged status despite the limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege.1

Anthony D’Andrea is a trustee of his father’s irrevocable trust. Greenberg Traurig represents D’Andrea in his capacity as Trustee. D’Andrea was sued by two of his siblings. The complaint seeks D’Andrea’s removal as Trustee and alleges a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the distribution of sale proceeds for certain property.

Greenberg Traurig does not represent D’Andrea in this litigation. Within that trust litigation, D’Andrea asserted the “advice of counsel defense,” pointing to his consultation with Greenberg Traurig and, specifically, attorney Francis B. Brogan, Jr. D’Andrea moved for summary judgment, and provided a detailed affidavit from attorney Brogan. Within that affidavit, attorney Brogan addresses the legal advice given regarding the property at issue in the trust litigation.

What followed was a subpoena for deposition duces tecum and notice of taking deposition on the non-party Records Custodian for Greenberg Traurig, P.A. The subpoena sought broad categories of discovery relating to the Trust.

Greenberg Traurig moved to quash the subpoena and for protective orders, arguing that D’Andrea’s limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege applied only to the transaction surrounding the specific property at issue in the underlying litigation. Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal, 943 So.2d 812, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Nevertheless, the firm produced documents, though it redacted portions which it deemed beyond that limited waiver. Following the trial court’s in camera inspection of the *1111redacted documents, it ordered Greenberg Traurig’s Record Custodian to produce all records, in unredacted form.

At issue are letters and e-mail correspondence between attorney Brogan and D’Andrea on the trust matter. Other redacted matters include “record keeping” and billing information.

We quash the portion of the order that requires the unredacted production of documents GT 01, GT 05, GT 11-12, and GT 13-30.2 The subject matter associated with documents GT 01 and GT 11-12 is beyond the scope of the express limited waiver. Paradise Divers, 943 So.2d at 814. The remaining redactions concern internal housekeeping information and billing entries and fee amounts, which in this case should remain confidential. See generally Paskoski v. Johnson, 626 So.2d 338, 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Jacob v. Barton, 877 So.2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

The petition for certiorari in this case is granted in part, and the order is quashed to the extent it requires the production of information beyond the express waiver of the privilege as set forth above. To be clear, of the documents provided to this court, GT 08 will be produced without redaction.

Petition granted in part.

FARMER, STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw