BRADLEY E. DALZELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2009-02-27
No. 5D09-117
TORPY, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
3 So. 3d 438 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Bradley Dalzell, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion seeking additional jail time credit. Because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record which refute Dalzell’s claim, the case must be reversed and remanded to the trial court with instructions that the court grant the requested relief or attach portions of the record refuting the claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Geralds v. State, 8 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …timely and verified rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief specifically identifying record evidence demonstrating that she is entitled to additional jail credit, and quantifying the exact amount of credit allegedly due. See Thompkins v. State, 3 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Affirmed. GROSS, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.…
  • Douse v. State, 61 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a Rule 3.800(a) motion which alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to that relief. See Thompkins v. State, 3 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Toro v. State, 719 So. 2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). POLEN, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw