RAYMOND L. KING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAYMOND L. KING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
3 So. 3d 1270
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The trial court’s order summarily denying King’s Rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail time credit is affirmed without prejudice to King’s right to file a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Hinlcel v. State, 937 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA2006).
AFFIRMED.
PALMER, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wayne Frier Home Ctr. OF Pensacola, Inc. v. Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P., 16 So. 3d 1006 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…cedure was a common practice. Wayne Frier, however, argues that the Hartleys mischaracterize the deposition testimony of Roberson. To plead a claim for punitive damages, a party must comply with section 768.72, Florida Statutes. Leavins v. Crystal, 3 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Estate of Despain v. Avante Group, Inc., 900 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Section 768.72(1) provides that in any civil action no claim for punitive damages shall be permitted “unless there is a reasonable showing by evidence…
Authorities Cited
- Hinkel v. State, 937 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)