LOUISE ALENE JONES, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-02-27
No. 1D08-2423
ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
4 So. 3d 80 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Topics
Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.800(C) Certiorari Jurisdiction

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.800(C) cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner’s motion for modification of sentence was timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Bacchus v. State, 958 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see also Jolly v. State, 803 So.2d 846 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (recognizing that although order denying motion to mitigate on the merits is not reviewable, appellate court may exercise its certiorari jurisdiction to review order where the motion was denied as untimely and, in fact, the motion was timely filed within 60 days of the date that the mandate issued in the petitioner’s direct appeal). The circuit court’s order is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions to dispose of the motion on the merits.

PETITION GRANTED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Antonelli v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 133 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
    …n (“PIP”) or property damage coverage under the policy at issue because, as UA correctly points out, those particular coverages are statutorily mandated. § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2013); § 324.022, Fla. Stat. (2013); see United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Reece, 4 So. 3d 80 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Affirmed in part and reversed in part.…
  • Arnett v. State, 150 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …PER CURIAM. Because petitioner’s motion for modification of sentence was timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. See Jones v. State, 4 So. 3d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Mathis v. State, 957 So. 2d 692, 692-93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Griffin v. State, 979 So. 2d 1253, 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding that “imposition” of sentence by trial court under Rule 3.800(c) includes sentence imposed by tria…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw