ANTHONY SCOTT HANNAH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So. 3d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …ting custody scheme in a final judgment inherently unstable. Cooper, 854 So. 2d at 267. The party seeking to modify a custody order bears an “extraordinary burden” to satisfy the “substantial change [*62] in circumstances” test. See Shaw v. Nelson, 4 So. 3d 740, 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Notwithstanding the movant’s extraordinary burden, a trial court’s order changing custody enjoys a presumption of correctness on appellate review and will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse of discretion. Wade, 903…
• LaCOSTE v. LaCOSTE, 58 So. 3d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …sented on the former husband’s affidavit. As it is entitled to do, the court resolved the evidentiary conflicts in the former husband’s favor and found the information in his affidavit accurate. We discern no abuse of discretion. See Shaw v. Nelson, 4 So. 3d 740, 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (child support determination reviewed for abuse of discretion and adherence to statutory guidelines). AFFIRMED. VAN NORTWICK and THOMAS, JJ., concur. . The former husband conveyed the land to himself and the former wife a…
• Nilsen v. Candice Ann (Greenwell) Nilsen, 63 So. 3d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …rom such guideline amount only upon a written finding explaining why ordering payment of such guideline amount would be unjust or inappropriate.”). This determination begins with a calculation of the parties’ incomes. § 61.30(2); see Shaw v. Nelson, 4 So. 3d 740, 743 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“In calculating child support, a trial court must determine each parent’s income.”). Because the trial court failed to give sufficient consideration to the guide [*852] lines, we must reverse this aspect of the order. The…