RODNY SCHENCK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-03-11
No. 3D08-2130
Before GERSTEN, C.J., LAGOA, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
5 So. 3d 765 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Montero v. State, 996 So.2d 888, 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Shorter v. State, 14 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …ng inaccurate scoresheets as “sentencing errors” subject to preserva [*1064] tion by rule 3.800(b)(2)); State v. Anderson, 905 So. 2d 111, 118 (Fla.2005) (stating that a rule 3.800(b) motion is a method to correct scoresheet error); Harper v. State, 5 So. 3d 765, 765-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (stating that scoresheet error was preserved for review by rule 3.800(b)(2) motion). Our record reflects that the trial court did not rule on the motion within sixty days; thus, we deem the motion denied. See Harper, 5 So.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw